From "France 24": Russia 'to renew offer to supply S-300s to Iran'
Russian President Vladimir Putin will offer to supply Iran S-300 air defence missile systems as well as build a second reactor at the Bushehr nuclear plant, the Kommersant business daily reported Wednesday.Get ready for WWIII!
6 comments:
There will not be a world war but their sure will be a Middle East war. We have dithered with Iran; Israel cannot wait much longer. Watch the prices of oil and gold.
Your Buddy Bush fell over practically kissing the butt cheeks of Putin when he POTUS. The guy's a louse. So, how is that Obama's fault?
There has not been a real statesman in the Office of the President since Ronald Reagan. The real question is will Israel allow additional nuclear weapons to be placed in the hands of their sworn enemies? Will the Russians retaliate if the Israelis blowup the new reactor? Will America have the guts to put Putin in his place? President Ronald Reagan would. George Bush, Bill Clinton, Dubia Bush or Barak Obama all have cowered down to the Russian Bear. Notwithstanding, even if the U.S. were to elect a “Reagan clone, Americans are too war weary from all of the failed Middle Eastern campaigns. It is too much for the Hawks expect America to back another poorly managed war that would only produce more of their young returning home in body bags.
Some seem to never be able to leave Bush. What does Bush have to do with anything now? Obama has been in office over four years. At least Bush acted when he spoke. He got rid of Saddam, gave Iraq a shot at self rule, by having troops in Iraq checked Iran and protected the flow of oil. Obama, by not following through On his big mouth over Syria and by taking all troops out of Iraq has virtually deserted the area. Does anyone believe he has the back of Israel? I'll bet Iran and Russia sure do not.
Uh, excuse me anon 2:11 pm, but Bush's plan was to turn Iraq over to self rule & take our troops out of there. Which is what Obama has done.
So now Obama has deserted the area including Syria? Is Hanna & the rest of Congress also deserting Syria if they vote against Obama's plan?
Anonymos is again wrong. The Bush plan called for an agreement to leave 20,000 troops in Iraq. The plan was already negotiated and Obama reversed it. By deserting the area, it is meant that we have no leverage at all in Libya, we helped kick Mubarak out only to wind up with a near civil war in Egypt, have no presence or influence in Iraq and now have no idea of what or what not to do in Syria. Can you possibly nbe serious to call it an Obama plan?
Post a Comment