At least with this voter.
Per the Utica Daily News, the Oneida Indian Nation has acknowledged sending the mailing that complains that Oneida County Sheriff Candidate Mr. Townsend voted "Against Protecting Students from Bullying and Harassment" not once -- but twice -- while he was Assemblyman.
Politically, the proponent of the mailing is seriously out of touch. Mr. Townsend's rejection of Assembly Bill A03661 is exactly the type of action that kept getting him re-elected time after time after time.
The law Mr. Townsend voted against is called the "Dignity for All Students Act" and supposedly would prevent bullying and harassment. The act defines several characteristics of students as being protected (race, color, weight, national origin, ethnic group, religion, religious practice, disability, sexual orientation, gender, and sex); requires state regulations, school district policies, sensitivity training of school personnel, student curriculum in "tolerance" etc. in each grade K through 12, and minimum suspensions for student transgressors; would create an "incident reporting" system; and, of course, provide grants to school districts. The law may be well intended, BUT . . .
"You can't legislate morality."
Human behavior and interactions are very complex and every situation is unique. We already have the Ten Commandments, the Golden Rule, and numerous statutes on the books that already inform us parents, students, and those who run our schools, of what is acceptable and not acceptable behavior. Adding twenty more pages of regulations will not improve the situation. Trying to regulate all activities in all situations with special rules is not only a futile exercise, but counter productive. It's like the "zero tolerance" ("zero brains" I call them) policies on "weapons" that require suspension of a kid who might innocently forget his cub scout jack knife in his pocket.
This law will not prevent bullying . . . but it WILL create a bureaucratic nightmare and a lot more spending.
Laws do not prevent bullying. Capable teachers and administrators do.
Administrators that need to cling to a rule book to enforce proper behavior frankly have no business running our schools.
Cheers to Mr. Townsend for rejecting another prescriptive, intrusive, "feel good," but ultimately ineffective, expensive and counterproductive law.
Meanwhile, OIN needs to stick to running its world class casino, golf courses, and other wonderful venues, and to stay out of politics . . . or it runs the risk of becoming another Barbra Streisand -- who should just shut up and sing.
6 comments:
The Oneida's interest in the sheriff race is yet another example of their playing both ends of the field. On the one hand they are "sovereign"; on the other they are citizens with the right to particiate in the American electoral process. Most voters recognize this form of arrogance.
Let's hope this backfires with the rest of the electorate too. Despite Maciol's claim to the contrary, he is right up there with RoAnn and the OIN. Probably why he hasn't done much fund raising--knew he wouldn't be needing it.
I used to have a positive opinion of the Oneida Nation, but not any more. Now, I am simply disgusted with them.
Makes you wonder how many other businesses are throwing money into public debates. Probably lots.
Of course many businesses contribute but only one that I know of claims to be a separate nation and not subject to taxation. At they same time, I guess they want to have a say in our electoral system. Of course they are citizens, of course they are only part sovereign whatever that means and of course they should pay taxes.
Yup. Makes you wonder how many generations are needed to absolve class guilt. And why does our culture persist in the belief that to help someone you have to treat them with special handling, raising their rights above those of others?
Post a Comment