Strike wrote that I said:My response to the above, of course, is that a discussion of the Police Commission is NOT a discussion of "a particular person or corporation" (emphasis supplied).Supervisor Tyksinski could have discussed the topic during executive session and then merely come out of executive session to adopt the resolution after the public left . . .And Strike replied:Oh really? And under what provision of the Open Meetings Law would such a discussion in executive session have fallen?My answer:under section 105-f. the medical, financial, credit or employment history of a particular person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal or removal of a particular person or corporation;
There! Short and to the point!